🔗 Share this article

In today's Britain, public demonstration is no longer a fundamental right. Instead, it has become a privilege that authorities allow or deny as they see fit. This constitutes the implication of new regulations that the current government is putting forward, which would determine when and where demonstrations can take place, with possible prison sentences for those who defy these limitations.

Gradual Weakening of Democratic Rights

Previous administrations had already weakened this essential right: the previous Tory administration had granted law enforcement sweeping new authorities, which international human rights organizations had censured as "significant and undue limitations" on democratic freedoms. Collectively, these incremental assaults on liberty have practically abolished the hard-won right to freedom of protest.

Exploiting Tragedy to Justify Crackdown

The most recent restrictive measures are being defended by citing last week's heinous antisemitic attack on a British mosque. There should be universal agreement that the safety of British Jews must be protected. However, using this horrific incident as a justification to suppress dissent is not only disconnected to that responsibility but perverts it.

"If you can't draw the line at genocide, you likely cannot draw the line at democratic principles," observed a well-known American author, a statement that rings true for the current government.

Historical Context of Protest

Consider Britain's long tradition of protest and activism against racism and authoritarianism, from the 1936 Battle of Cable Street to after World War II Jewish anti-fascist movements and the 1970s demonstrations against the National Front. Many of these early protesters were branded as extremists in their time, even while they were advocating the rights of marginalized groups.

Current Reality

In today's complicated landscape, here's what's actually occurring: Israel – a sovereign nation – is committing acts that international bodies have characterized as systematic destruction. Its warfare have led the International Criminal Court to issue arrest warrants against Benjamin Netanyahu and his ex-military leader.

Western popular sentiment has changed significantly against Israel's military campaign. In Britain, a substantial majority of the public believe Israel has likely committed war crimes. Most people would support a complete ban on weapons exports to the state, and back the arrest of the Israeli leader.

Silencing Dissent

Having largely lost the public debate, pro-Israel advocates are now seizing on a despicable antisemitic crime to try to silence a mass movement against a moral catastrophe. The British government appears to be included in this attempt. Ministers have failed to implement comprehensive sanctions on Israel and have permitted arms exports to continue.

People who are protesting against the destruction of Gaza have been characterized as dangerous radicals. Yet there's a important factor why there hasn't been a more extensive suppression on these protesters until now: very limited protesters have made truly offensive statements about Jewish people, giving law enforcement little justification to take action.

Dangerous Conflation

Equating Jewish identity with the actions of the government of Israel is not only cynical but also dangerous. The official definition of antisemitism, accepted by the British government and numerous institutions, has been appropriately challenged for potentially restricting valid commentary of Israel. However, there should be universal agreement about one of its key examples: that "holding Jewish people collectively responsible for decisions of the state of Israel" constitutes antisemitism.

Escalating Restrictions

This is why we've reached a point where law enforcement can propose that demonstrations criticizing Israel's policies should be canceled because they might "inadvertently or deliberately" support antisemitism. Similarly, government officials have stated that recognition of Palestine as a nation has made organizations "implicated" in alleged abuse experienced by Jewish communities.

Inconsistent Treatment

On the same day as the synagogue attack, the Israel's army killed numerous of Palestinian civilians in Gaza – adding to the terrible count from 24 months of daily atrocities that have claimed tens of thousands of lives. British politicians and news organizations have hardly hidden the limited value they attach to Palestinian life. This represents one of the boldest demonstrations of racism in contemporary society.

Breaking Boundaries

Our government has already crossed a concerning threshold by proscribing Palestine Action, a peaceful, anti-genocide direct action organization. Thousands of British demonstrators have been detained, mostly for carrying signs against mass killing and supporting the banned organization. Many of those detained are pensioners; including a retired priest and the child of a World War II genocide survivor.

Global Comparisons

It's not difficult to see where this path leads. In the United States, political leaders helped demonize pro-Palestinian protests: a former House Speaker suggested that some were "connected to" other nations, while the sitting leader described such protests as anti-Jewish. In doing so, they helped legitimize the authoritarian crackdown on such demonstrations – and on freedom of expression in general.

Future Concerns

If a hard-right government comes to power, it would be granted sweeping powers to suppress dissent. What might a Reform government do with this restrictive framework? Our ancestors fought, suffered and sacrificed their lives to secure our freedoms. We may ultimately rue how easily we permitted them to be eroded.